UK public sector blogging in one place! RSS, or Email. Download the OPML file. Find out more.

Posted on 21 November 2008 | 5:30 pm
I have to thank Mark Stephens for posting the link to the interesting piece (below) on the NI14 online community on the IDeA web site.
I wasn’t too keen on the concept of eel collagen makeup, but I don’t have to wear it, however the company and its management methods sound fascinating. After several bad business experiences over the years they’ve made a success and primarily because the customer is made king and that has had the effect of empowering the employees. The thought of a senior manager ringing a customer back within ten minutes from the sniff of a complaint to sort things out obviously has the desired effect, along with their associated community and environmental policies. The staff manually log 8000 communications a day, which are all reviewed by corporate maangement and which generate 400 suggestions for improvement, for which action plans are created. They are making positive use of complaints. Read it for yourself:

Posted on 21 November 2008 | 2:01 pm
Just back home from the LGA/IDeA/Leadership Centre Innovation conference. Here are a few points from it (not representative, or even the best – some things are hard to summarise – like a very powerful video from Ruth Kennedy of ThePublicOffice, http://www.thepublicoffice.org.uk/index.aspx, of a family’s difficulties with a daughter with learning difficulties – real ‘customer insight’).
· Some inspirational trips of children abroad – Serbia, South Africa – but often rubbished by the press. Some of the best ‘social cohesion’ activities are very simple, though – Lewisham young mayors scheme, Newham community planting days, Harrow Divali celebrations – which all bring people together.
· Mike Freer, Leader of Barnet, talked about innovative work on commissioning, behaviour change and ‘conversations with the community’. Also noted that targets and performance management are good for stable issues but not so much for complex problems like obesity, where you need a trial and error approach
· Simon Tucker, Young Foundation.
· Complaints choirs sing their complaints to the council (it works apparently). Started in Birmingham, moved on to Helsinki, Budapest and elsewhere.
· You would expect 1% spending on R&D and innovation – we don’t have figures for UK local government, but most likely nowhere near that.
· If you’re doing innovation, you may fail, so ensure your stakeholders know that. If you’re going to fail, try and make it early and small. Have a portfolio of innovation, so even if you fail sometimes there are also successes.
· Young Foundation are developing a toolkit of innovation methods with Nesta. Intending to share and develop through a wiki on the Nesta website in the next month or so.
· Innovating requires different skills than running services, so it’s often helpful to have intermediaries to help (it’s a market that needs building)
· Charlie Leadbeater –
· entertaining example of a YouTube video of a boy playing his guitar in his bedroom that got 51 million hits and comparing that to what would have happened if he’d tried to broadcast that through old media (going to ITV commissioners saying you want to broadcast a 5’21” video of me playing my guitar in the bedroom …)
· It’s quite a delicate process that determines when a social networking initiative will take off. Key factors include: a core that others can gather around; the tools and motivation to contribute; lateral, not centralised communications; collaboration.
· Comment – to make best use of social networking, we councils need to accept we’ll have to lose control. CL – but you’re not in control! These things are already happening without you!
· Jonathan Kestenbaum, despite being a former venture capitalist and now Chief Exec of Nesta (http://www.nesta.org.uk/) reminded us that innovation isn’t easy and even the ‘experts’ can get it wrong. You need carefully selected partners – people who can make things happen. Involve your commissioners early. Easy to get the timing from prototyping to scaling up, wrong. Useful to have money separate from mainstream budgets so not subject to the same accountability and risk management. Multidisciplinary teams talk very different languages and take time to get to work. You need a problem for them to tackle; don’t just bring them together and hope.
· Sir Michael Bichard, had 10 things innovative leaders should do. Lead by example. Reshape the incentives (rewards for innovative people). Build capacity (including skills in tools of innovation). Increase energy (cut paper work and meetings). Manage risk and failure. Revisit structures (not hierarchical and introspective). Reduce narrow targets. Build partnerships (within and beyond the organisation). Connect with the front line (and clients). ‘Nurture’ before ‘audit’ (give ideas time to grow).
· We’ve got the wrong balance between accountability and innovation at the moment and need to rebalance it.
There were lots of ideas generated during the conference – many made their way onto an ‘innovation wall’. Due to be made available more widely at some point (hopefully through these communities of practice?).

Posted on 21 November 2008 | 1:11 pm
Sir Bonar writes:
When my wife Euphorbia is angry she has the annoying habit of playing Chopin very loud and fast on our old Bosendorfer. And I must say that recently her feelings have been rather more heated than could truly be said to be consistent with domestic harmony on the subject of our national ID register and how it affects Evelyn, her former brother who is now her younger sister.
Euphorbia maintains that Evelyn is a single person, insofar as any of us is the same person as we ever were at any stage in the past.
Philosophers may muse about whether you are the same person at the end of reading this article as ou were at the beginning, but we public servants have no such luxury. Tom the drug dealer is Tom the drug dealer whether he is applying for a fishing licence or helping an old lady across the road. Dick the terrorist is Dick the terrorist, whether he’s driving the wrong way up a one-way street or applying for a TV licence. Harry the paedophile remains Harry the paedohile whether he’s taking unlicensed photographs on Waterloo station of chaining his bicycle to a lampost in Trafalgar Square. And Evelyn the bookish moustachioed Don remains Evelyn even if she now passes herself off as a bluestocking. In each case there can be only one entry on the National Identity Register. Otherwise chaos might ensue.
But my wife simply would not let the matter rest, and I can see her point. When Evelyn wants to buy a gin and tonic she will show her ID Card as a matter of course. But what sort of impression will it make if the Card shows a dashing young man, when she goes to such efforts to present herself as an elegant woman?
My solution is simple. Evelyn will be permitted to buy two Identity cards. Each one of them will bring her enormous benefits, allowing her to apply for jobs, open bank accounts and prevent terrorism in the most convenient manner imaginable. Each will cost her £30, but she will only have to update the Register once if her other details change.
I think this example goes to show the tremendous flexibility and convenience of the solution we have devised, and I’m hopeful Euphorbia’s strong views on the matter are now mollified.
Posted on 21 November 2008 | 11:17 am
I spent Wednesday at Microsoft as part of the launch of e-skills Big Ambition initiative which aims to increase the number of girls in ICT.
The figures are depressing, whilst the number of women studying technical subjects has increased in recent years, the number of women studying ICT has fallen and it continues to fall.
What is it about my world that makes it so unattractive to women?
We had some great speakers on Wednesday who made it plain that it was possible for women to succeed in IT, have a great job and manage to achieve a winning work/life balance. The audience of 170 13~14 year old girls were obviously inspired by what they had heard as only 33% said they would consider a career in ICT at the start of the day but that had risen to 81% by the end of the day.
Part of the day was a workshop where the girls came up with new ICT product ideas which they presented to a panel of judges, of which I was one. The ideas were fun, well thought through and there was a real sense of excitement about the whole process.
So how do we preserve that sense of excitement and engagement? How do we make our world visibly appealing to a wide range of people?
Why is ICT such a monoculture? Not just in terms of gender or ethnicity but mindset as well. People will talk about how it attracts people into maths, physics, logic hence it is mainly a world of inward focused people whose minds run on linear paths.
But that strikes me as a description, not an explanation. In ICT we spend much of our lives working with people, not machines. Trying to work out what it is that people want to do. Testing our assumptions with them. Training them how to use the systems. The machine bit, the “logical” bit is the easy part, ICT is not an exercise in hermeticism, it’s about making things happen for people.
The more we can do to encourage a broad swathe of people into the profession the better. I am sure that one of the reasons why so many corporate systems are ugly, inefficient and hard to use is that we have allowed ICT to become a world of stereotypes.
It’s down to all of us in the profession to challenge those stereotypes and encourage diversity. Not for moral reasons, though those are important, but because else we will simply be unable to deliver the critical systems which people need from us.
Oh and someone asked me about the “dream job” line on the Big Ambition website. My dream job? IT obviously

Posted on 21 November 2008 | 9:10 am
Look what I found interesting. Maybe you will too.
Posted on 21 November 2008 | 6:05 am
In an attempt to get some feedback about the Parliament Podcast Pilot we visited a secondary school in South London. It was a really positive experience.
We spoke to a group of about 20 first year A-Level Government and Politics students. We did a few demonstrations and asked the students to do some exercises which got them to visit different parts of the site. The students also filled in a questionnaire which provided some useful insight into their level of political engagement and how they access information about politics and current affairs.
Throughout we encouraged discussion and feedback about the various services on the site. The group we spoke to gave us lots of constructive feedback about podcasts and the site as a whole. We are using this experience to inform the development of the podcast pilot.
Posted in podcasts
Posted on 21 November 2008 | 2:27 am
Some of you may remember, have been at, or heard about UKGovBarCamp last year. It was the catalyst for many great things.
Well, it is on again.
(Un)fortunately I am not involved in this one - yes, it will be less noisy! It is being held slap bang in the middle of when my day job goes stratospheric. I will be involved in other things later in the year and will bring you tidings of these as soon as I know.
It will be great fun - even though I won’t be there
- sign up, I expect places will go very quickly.

Posted on 21 November 2008 | 2:13 am
Classic pertinent art about Whitehall - the paranoia about departmental budgets, the rivalry with Japan. This must be the only Ministry which hasn’t been renamed in the last 40 years.
From the wonderful official Monty Python YouTube channel.
Posted on 20 November 2008 | 10:38 pm

Posted on 20 November 2008 | 5:30 pm
Tom Watson points us all to a new wiki for getting the next barcamp for UK (and elsewhere) government webbies going.
Sign up and start thinking about you could present about! I have already put down that I’m interested in running a social media surgery which worked so well at the UK Youth event in September, and which is being pioneered amongst the blogging community in Birmingham.
For a flavour of what went on last year, check out the aggregated stuff on the pageflake. For discussion of the event, last year’s Google Group is being used again.
I am really happy to promote and support this event as much as I possibly can - last year’s event had a tremendous effect on me, in the friendships I made and the developments I my career. It’s an easy and maybe glib-sounding thing to say, but I wouldn’t be where I am today without the Barcamp, and I encourage everyone to make as much of it as they can this time around!
Jeremy has now blogged it too.
Posted on 20 November 2008 | 4:27 pm
People have been asking me almost since the end of the last one when the next government barcamp would be held.
I’ve been reluctant to be involved in planning or organising it, partly because I thought there were plenty of others who could take it on (and it was a lot of work to get off the ground), partly because I wasn’t sure why we needed to have another one (otherwise someone else would have organised it?).
Doing something to follow up the barcamp has been on my mind for some time and I’ve thrown out all sorts of ideas without any real conclusion to the discussions.
Anyway it just so happened that two days ago discussion about a follow up barcamp came up on three separate occasions. Over lunch with two of my fellow conspirators from the first barcamp I was persuaded encouraged by them that now is the right time to think about another event.
Why? Because so much has happened in the last year of egovernment. In January 2008 it was all about making connections, getting the network going, and thinking about the possibilities.
But a year on, there’s a lot to show for the energy generated by the barcamp. Great social media projects, brilliant initiatives to make better use of government data, excellent work to improve existing government websites, and a geek minister.
Its never easy for us all to get together to share what we’ve done, how we did it, what went well, what went not so well. What you’re planning next.
So, what are you doing on Saturday 31st January 2009? Don’t know where it will be yet (but have a few ideas) or what will happen. But as I learnt to my cost last year, that’s all part of the fun. Hope you can make it.

Posted on 20 November 2008 | 3:56 pm
As the site says “This event should be of interest to all who work in the UK government digital media community: permanent civil servants, contractors, consultants, agencies, advisers, supporters, observers, and critics.”
Posted on 20 November 2008 | 3:44 pm
So a bit of a first for me coming to a conference semi-officially to blog it rather than participate and tweet as a form of stress relief. Although that has meant spending all day in a suit AND a tie to try and fit in with the local government crowd, something I'm less and less comfortable with but does me I fly under the radar quite nicely with so few in the sector on Twitter!
Posted on 20 November 2008 | 12:27 pm
"Working through Screens is a reference for product teams creating new or iteratively improved applications for thinking work. Written for use during early, formative conversations, it provides teams with a broad range of considerations for setting the overall direction and priorities for their onscreen tools. With hundreds of envisioning questions and fictional examples from clinical research, financial trading, and architecture, this volume can help definers and designers to explore innovative new directions for their products."
Posted on 20 November 2008 | 8:00 am
Further to the post on what should Obama’s CTO be doing look who’s tackling the rather bigger and more general question What should Bazzer O’Bazzer himself do? It’s our old friend David Price, whose Debategraph service has done a deal with the Independent. Sounds a perfect match. Go David! Go Bazz! Yes we can. Heal this world.
PS - It would have cleared up a lot of misunderstanding in the US media if Al Quaeda could have given their message about Obama’s abandonment of the Muslim faith BEFORE the election. Then maybe the confused-by-Fox of middle America might have understood the nuances of his relationship with Islam better.
Posted on 20 November 2008 | 5:12 am
I know what you're thinking - "he just can't stay away can he?". Well you'd be right! Having had such fun at the first Social Innovation Camp and since then working with pal Denise on her vision for Enabled by Design, I couldn't resist putting in a couple of ideas in for Camp 2. So obviously I'm rather excited (if a little sheepish) to say that one of the ideas, AccessCity, has been chosen as one of the six ideas that will be worked on over the weekend of 5-7 December by myself and (hopefully!) a gang of socially minded geeky types.
Posted on 20 November 2008 | 4:59 am
Sometimes one’s speech in debate doesn’t quite go according to plan. On Tuesday afternoon 17 November, Lord Warner had raised a short debate on the Charter for Dying Well produced by the organisation Dignity in Dying http://www.dignityindying.org.uk. The Charter contained much that everyone could agree with but also included a call for the legalisation of the right to request an assisted death when terminally ill at a time of the individual’s own choosing, a sentiment I agree with strongly. There was only an hour tabled for the debate, I guessed we’d get about 5 minutes each. Then 16 people put their names down to speak and I cut down the speech to 2 minutes. Then the Government Whips Office decided to let us have an hour and a half, giving the by now 20 of us 3 minutes each. I was rushing about beforehand, my notes got in a mess. I followed the ineffably cool and elegant Baroness Jay, who was as lucid and measured as ever. I lost page 2, I dropped page 4 and frankly lost the thread of my talk. With 3 minutes one can’t afford to get it wrong. I feared I implied depressed old people should be offered assisted dying, hardly the thing for a psychiatrist to say and indeed the opposite of what I meant. I looked at Hansard with some trepidation yesterday and by some miracle, they’d managed to say broadly what I meant better than I had! Not perfect but a bit of a rescue job. Next time I shall rehearse better for that important 2 or 3 minutes.
So John Sargeant, the erstwhile political broadcaster and now amateur ballroom dance TV competitor has voluntarily stepped down from Strictly Come Dancing, (and it was headline news on the Evening Standard billboards last night) recognising that his popularity with the public voters was subverting the purpose of the show. What a pity, I enjoyed watching him just as much as the strutting showbiz professionals. Just think what would happen if popular but talentless members of both houses of parliament stood down in favour of the skilled and competent but less popular….

Posted on 20 November 2008 | 3:40 am
Labour MP for Newport West, Paul Flynn has apparently 'been stripped of a Parliamentary allowance for making fun of other MPs on his blog', if you read today's BBC piece on the subject. Flynn himself tells the story slightly differently, on said blog.
I've had a similar run-in with my own MP, Newbury's Richard Benyon (Con). Back in September, the first posting on his new blog made some undeniably party-political comments: he talked about Labour being in a state of 'desperation', and his boss David Cameron '[continuing] to look like a Prime Minister in waiting'.
Good old political knockabout, nothing wrong with that... except his website proudly declared on every page that it is 'paid for from his Communications Allowance', which is explicitly not to be used 'to promote, criticise or campaign for or against anyone seeking election'. To his credit, he made swift if superficial amends: I don't see from a technical viewpoint how it's possible for www.richardbenyon.com/blog 'not [to be] connected to www.richardbenyon.com'.
The point is this: as both Flynn and Benyon have said, playing by the Parliamentary allowance's rules would have meant a 'totally non-political, fence sitting and boring' blog. With the cost of setting up a basic blog being so low, indeed zero in most cases, it doesn't make sense to take a chance with the 'Byzantine complexity of the House of Commons rules' (to quote Mr Benyon, although frankly I'm not buying that; the rules couldn't be much clearer).
If you're an MP, and you want to start a blog, here are the facts:
There's absolutely no shame in using the free options; and if you decide you need more, for whatever reason, you're looking at a couple of hundred quid, tops... with most of that going to the friendly geek who sets it up for you. I dare say many MPs could find that kind of sum down the back of their sofa.
Spending a portion of your Communications Allowance on a blog is just The Wrong Thing To Do. And frankly it calls into question the purpose of the 'totally non-political, fence sitting and boring' Allowance in the first place. £10,000 times 646 MPs, times 4 years in a typical Parliament equals... no, don't, it's a terrifying answer.
PS: By sheer coincidence, I note that the British Computer Society held its MP Website Awards today: winners were Derek Wyatt, John Hutton, Alan Johnson and Kerry McCarthy. All Labour, for the record.
Posted on 19 November 2008 | 6:59 pm